Simulation Results¶
In this simulation, the SSVEP templates generated by the proposed stimulus-stimulus method (without using calibration data of target stimuli) is compared with
SSVEP templates without using calibration data of target stimuli
Sine-cosine signals (CCA [1])
SSVEP templates generated by the superposition theory based SSVEP signal model (tlCCA [2])
SSVEP templates using calibration data of target stimuli
Averaged signals (eCCA [3])
Comparisons of classification accuracy and ITR of porposed method and other methods without using calibration data of target stimuli¶
Comparisons of classification accuracy and ITR of porposed method and method using calibration data of target stimuli¶
Individual maximum ITR¶
References¶
Lin, C. Zhang, W. Wu, and X. Gao, “Frequency recognition based on canonical correlation analysis for SSVEP-based BCIs,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 2610-2614, 2006, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2006.886577.
Wong, Z. Wang, A. C. Rosa, C. L. P. Chen, T.-P. Jung, Y. Hu, and F. Wan, “Transferring subject-specific knowledge across stimulus frequencies in SSVEP-based BCIs,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Sci. Eng., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 552-563, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TASE.2021.3054741.
Nakanishi, Y. Wang, Y.-T. Wang, Y. Mitsukura, and T.-P. Jung, “A high-speed brain speller using steady-state visual evoked potentials,” Int. J. Neur. Syst., vol. 24, no. 06, p. 1450019, 2014, doi: 10.1142/S0129065714500191.